Lethbridge protesters rally as Alberta’s Bill 11 takes effect

Health care advocates in Lethbridge, Alta., gathered Tuesday as Alberta’s Bill 11 took effect, calling on the federal authorities to take action over concerns the legislation will create a two-tier health-care system. Bill 11 allows physicians to work in both the public and private systems, incl...
Health care advocates in Lethbridge, Alta., gathered Tuesday as Alberta’s Bill 11 took effect, calling on the federal authorities to take action over concerns the legislation will create a two-tier health-care system.
Bill 11 allows physicians to work in both the public and private systems, including providing paid services while continuing to work in the public system.
Lethbridge Friends of Medicare Chair Bev Muendel-Atherstone says protesters want the Canadian the government body to determine whether the changes comply with the Canada Health Act.
In a related development, “That’s why we’re asking the federal authorities to get on the ball and say that this is a violation of the Canada Health Act,” remarked Muendel-Atherstone.
She says amongst their concerns is that private practices will pull doctors away from Alberta’s public sector.
“We already have 400 surgeons out of the 550 surgeons in Alberta who mentioned they’re going to sign on. That means you’ll be paying out of your pocket for your surgery. They’re taking surgeons out of the public health care system and putting them into private.”
Furthermore, maddison McKee, press secretary for the Alberta Ministry of Hospital and Surgical Health Services declared in a statement to Global News that Bill 11 is not a movement towards U.S.-style health care, but an alignment with other top health care models.
“The reality is that dual practice brings Alberta more in line with other top-performing health systems, including Denmark, the Netherlands, France, Germany, Spain, and Australia. These countries all combine strong public funding with modern, flexible delivery models,” declared McKee in the statement.
But Muendel-Atherstone says she believes the changes will make it harder for those relying on the public system for timely care.
Additionally, “It’s not true. The lineups will be longer. We won’t have the same people working in the public system.”
She calls the changes a serious threat to publicly funded health care.
“It’s a travesty for our public healthcare system,” remarked Muendel-Atherstone.
It is worth noting that meanwhile Ottawa says it’s communicating with Alberta.
In a statement from Alexandre Bergeron, press secretary to federal Health Minister Marjorie Michel, it’s stated that the focus never waivers from protecting access to medical care.
“Minister Michel is advancing targeted discussions with her counterpart focused on ensuring access to medically necessary care and the core principles of the public system are protected. We have taken a collaborative approach with all provinces and territories, including Alberta, that respects their jurisdiction to explore innovative ways to improve access and care while strengthening the public, universal health care system.”
In the broader context, and the Alberta the government body disputes the claim that these changes violate the Canada Health Act.
“Dual practice does not violate the Canada Health Act. The Act does not prohibit private practice outside the publicly insured system. Albertans who choose to pay privately for eligible elective surgery should be able to do so here at home, rather than travelling out of province as they have done for decades,” remarked McKee.
She says Albertans who choose to pay privately should be able to do so without leaving the province.
Notably, “Our priority is a strong public system and ensuring Albertans never have to pay out of pocket for medically necessary care – which is a commitment we have made under our Public Health Care Guarantee. Expanding access through dual practice does not take away from that. It adds to it. This is not an either/or debate. It is about giving Albertans more choice.”
Protesters in Lethbridge say the debate comes down to whether those who can’t afford private care will face even longer wait times to receive the care they need.
“Money will decide whether you get proper healthcare in a timely fashion. That’s why we’re here today, to rally together and make awareness,” stated Barb Phillips with Lethbridge Raging Grannies, a group of women that advocates for social justice and environmental issues.
Significantly, “If it’s not affecting you today, it could well affect you tomorrow,” added Phillips, emphasizing that she believes these changes will eventually affect everyone.
Phillips says protesters want to see Alberta’s existing public health care model protected.
“We should be preserving our health-care system. We should be preserving the Canada Health Act.”
Meanwhile, and she says the Alberta administration needs to hear their concerns.
“We should be sending the message to our provincial administration that Bill 11, this carving up of our public health-care system, is not acceptable. It’s catching the vulnerable.”
The protest in Lethbridge was a part of a National Day of Action organized by Friends of Medicare and health care advocacy groups across Canada.
Related Articles
WorldAfter passing Bill 5, Ford government asked staff for suggestions on how to use law
Days after passing a controversial law to create special economic zones, where provincial and municipal rules could be suspended, the Ford the government body cast a wide net looking for ideas on how to actually use its new powers. The spring 2025 sitting of the Ontario legislature was dominated...
World

