When my oldest child was born, I immediately set up Gmail and Twitter accounts in her name. I broadly unveiled her birth online and proceeded to plaster her photo across all sorts of platforms. In short, I began creating her digital footprint long before she could stand on her own two feet.

Fast-forward a couple of years to when my second kid came, and I had essentially the opposite reaction. I wanted to make sure I preserved her privacy. I didn’t want her birthday to be a matter of public record or her face to feed the algorithms. In time, I would go back and scrub much of the early footprint I had created for my first child as well.

What happened? I watched the promise of the early internet give way to the reality of its potential for abuse. I myself was already fully in the throes of smartphone and social media obsession. My wife, a pediatric nurse, grew increasingly alarmed at the number of children admitted to her hospital struggling with the effects of things like body dysmorphia or cyberbullying as a result of interactions on social media. We became those parents. The ones whose kids carry flip phones and aren’t on TikTok.

In a related development, we are not alone in this. A surprising—maybe troubling—number of people I know who work at big tech companies also keep their kids at arm’s distance from technology. They lock down their phones, if they have phones at all, and keep them off social media. Hell, even Mark Zuckerberg doesn’t publicly post his children’s faces on Facebook or Instagram.

If the desire to limit kids’ use of technology was once a subcurrent, it has become a raging flood. Jonathan Haidt’s best-selling 2024 book The Anxious Generation helped propel the issue into the mainstream (despite criticisms of his conclusions from some developmental psychologists). Last year, Australia became the first nation to enact a social media ban for children under 16. Other nations, from Austria to Indonesia, have followed suit, announcing similar bans. The US Supreme Court in recent times upheld an age verification law in Texas, which acts as a de facto ban, and various states have flirted with their own measures. School districts all over the country are banning educational devices like iPads and Chromebooks in favor of actual books. Kids themselves seem to be embracing this tech skepticism too: The hottest gadget among the Gen Alpha set is a vintage Sony Walkman.

We have to prepare our children to live in the actual world we have actually created, not the one we wish we had.

Furthermore, yet there is no hiding from technology. It permeates nearly everything, everywhere. And so we have to prepare our children to live in the actual world we have actually created, not the one we wish we had. How can we help kids survive and thrive in what we have wrought?

It’s a question that feels all the more urgent in the era of AI. To help answer it, we brought in the editors of Anyway—an utterly fantastic magazine for teens and tweens that is so good in extensive part because it meets them where they are. (If there is a teen in your life, I highly recommend it.) They helped us with the stories you’ll see in this issue, and they asked kids to share in their own words how they are feeling about AI and what’s to come. What those young people told Anyway was complex, fascinating, and, to an incredible extent, thoughtful and sophisticated.

Meanwhile, I’ve loosened the digital tether—just a bit. I still don’t post several photos of my kids online, and I remain abundantly concerned about the perils of social media and AI.

Additionally, but when my older daughter started high school, we retired the flip phone in favor of an iPhone. And my younger one now sports an Apple Watch. These devices have opened up the world to them in all sorts of ways. They help forge new friendships, building relationships that move seamlessly between digital and physical spaces. They allow my kids to roam free—or at least more freely—beyond the known spaces of our neighborhood and across the city.

Along the way, they’re learning and testing boundaries, just the way they’re supposed to. I guess you could say I am too.

It makes it easy to trick them into doing things they shouldn’t, such as telling you how to sabotage an aircraft’s navigation system.

It is worth noting that a new technique has let the company probe deeper than ever into the weird workings of an LLM.

AI doesn’t just learn stereotypes from its training. It can cook up new ones, too.

The misbehavior is called reward hacking. This is what you need to know.

In the broader context, discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.